Monday, August 29, 2011

828爱国印记报导

劳勿武吉公满人民非一般的国庆庆祝~
"828爱国印记:一人一手印,同心抗山埃!"
已圆满结束。
一个小时内得到百余名村民响应
以手印记下捍卫家园的一页!


绵绵细雨未能阻止村民热爱家园的心!
很多村民还不惜冒雨参与此次
俱特殊意义的活动。
虽然布条准备的不足
导致有很多村民未能把手印打上,
但是你们捍卫家园的决心
足以让《抗山­埃保家园》 运动走得更远。。。


Merdeka!
We love Malaysia!
Green & Clean!











Thursday, August 25, 2011

T-shirt on sale!T-shirt 正在售卖中!

Dear friends,

Bancyanide movement T-shirt is now on sale.
All profit generated from T-shirt selling will be contributed to our legal aids fund.
For those who is interested, please leave your message in our page in Facebook, or send email to bancyanide@gmail.com.
We will reply you asap.


Please support us to ban cyanide!


各位朋友,

《抗山埃保家园》运动T-shirt已经开始售卖。
售卖t-shirt 所得盈利将全部充作《抗山埃保家园》法律援助基金。
有意订购的朋友请在我们的面子书~抗山埃保家园留言,或email至bancyanide@gmail.com。
我们将尽快跟您联系。


请支持《抗山埃保家园》运动!

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

824 SUHAKAM提呈备忘录延期通知!



由于2位反山埃委员会核心人物身体抱恙,
2位六旬老人一人肺进水入院,
一人严重感冒。

情非得已在此宣布,

明日到SUHAKAM
提呈备忘录一事
延期
直至另行通知。

如有任何不便之处,敬请多多包涵与原谅!
再次感谢大家对《抗山埃保家园》运动的支持!

也祝愿2位老战士早日康复!




824 SUHAKAM提呈备忘录


村民在检验出周遭空气严重受污染后,
有感生存权利受
威胁


劳勿武吉公满反山埃采金委员会将于
明天(24-8-2011, 星期三)

中午十二点
到SUHAKAM(人权委员会)提呈备忘录

有意参与者请在明早11.00AM 到隆雪华堂集合, 谢谢!

Monday, August 22, 2011

828爱国印记:一人一手印,同心抗山埃!




又逢国庆月,

劳勿同胞们,
我们相约828(星期日)
下午2时正
劳勿武吉公满新村民众会堂前

留下您捍卫家园的手印,
一起体验非一般的国庆!


一人一手印,
同心抗山埃!

我们爱我们的家园!
我们爱我们的国家!

Sunday, August 21, 2011

筹募法律援助基金

为了孩子为了子孙, 我们没有后退的路!
虽然上诉庭驳回上诉申请,
可是我们坚持走到联邦法院.
面对强权挑战财团,我们没有畏惧的权力!
请大家支持<抗山埃,保家园>,
捍卫绿色环境和下一代.

汇聚人民的力量,
筹募法律援助基金:
Public Bank Berhad
4-5738960-29
(Wong Pak Foh, Wong Kee Fah, Chang Kin Min)

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

事件背景(Chronology of event)

事件背景




  • 1997113日,环境局批准金矿公司的初步环境评估报告。村民毫不知情

  • 2006124,村民获知山埃危害,成立反对山埃采金委员

  • 2007年曾致函及呈交备忘录予首相阿都拉、马华会长黄家定,林敬益,陈广才,廖中莱,何启文,劳勿区国会议员黄燕燕,请他们关注山埃采金事件,可是石沉大海。
    20077月,寻求环保组织马来西亚环境之友(Sahabat Alam Malaysia)的法律援助。
    村民通过多种管道,一年后才取得该报告,并马上聘请美国专家研究有关报告。

  • 美国专家Dr.Glenn C. Miller的结论: 1)没说明如何处理化学废料残渣和废气。2)没含盖居民健康及安全的危险性。3)没列明防范措施

  • 2008321日,入禀法院申请司法复核,

    1)推翻环境局以1997年初步环境评估报告批准山埃采金的执照 2)并要求金矿公司进行详细环境评估报告



  • 败诉不到一周,村民立即作出上诉。相隔几个月,金矿也提出上诉,要求我方支付堂费。



  • 20092月,金矿开始操作,空气中弥漫刺鼻难闻化学异味。短短1个月内300人身体不适。



  • 2009年,环境部应村民要求放置空气探测器,但是短短6天却被撤走,对外宣称武吉公满空气没受污染!



  • 2009年,村民自行购置空气探测器,全天候检测村内空气指数。空气探测报告与环境部有天渊之别!

  • 201183日,上诉庭驳回村民的上诉申请理由:我们迟了11!!!

  • 由于涉及公众利益,村民无需支付对方堂费。


Chronology of event



  • 13 Jan 1997, without the resident’s knowledge, Department of Environment approved the preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA) submitted by the Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM).

  • 4th Dec 2006, the ‘Bukit Koman Action Committee Against the Use of Cyanide in Mining of Gold’ formed.

  • Throughout 2007, written memorandums to various organization representative and assembly persons to seek for assistance and clarification, but fail as the return.

  • July 2007, committee sought technical and legal aids from Sahabat Alam Malaysia.

  • October 2007, after various effort and attempts, the resident received the PEIA finally and appointed expert to review the documents.

  • Feb 2008, Environmental Science Expert and committee member of International Cyanide Management Code, Dr. Glenn C. Miller from US visited Bukit Koman, Raub. He released an expert report stated RAGM failed to comply to the following:
    1)Describe the sufficient and significant information about the detoxification (destruction) of Cyanide, as well as the hazardous waste and gas emission.
    2)Include the healthiness of the resident, as well as informing about the hazardous of the chemical used and the emergency plan. 3) Compliance with international standards.

  • 21st March 2008, the committee apply for judicial review on the report, 1)To challenge the decision of the Depart­ment of Environment Director-General (D-G) in approving a preliminary environmental impact assessment (EIA) report involving a mining project which uses sodium cyanide to extract gold.2)To request for a Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) from RAGM.

  • 2009, residents bought few units of SO2 and HCN air quality monitoring devices, the results showed significant differences to what has been reported by the Department of Environment.

  • http://bancyanide.blogspot.com/ created to inform the public about the predicament that faced by the resident of Bukit Koman.

  • 1st June 2009, High Court rejected the judicial review on the following grounds:1)Public can only challenge the PEIA within 40 days after the approval.2)The Department of Environment - PEIA is sufficient; DEIA from the Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM) is unnecessary.

  • The residents appeal the case within a week. Few months later, RAGM appealed to court requested the prosecutor to pay the legal fee (earlier, the Hight Court judge ruled the case involve public interest and waived the court fee).

  • 23 June 2009, submitted the memorandum to Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation (received by Deputy Minister of Prime Minister Department) in the Parliament.

  • July 2009, thousands of residents stage a peaceful protest and demonstration in the village.

  • October, 2009, organized a dinner and briefing. However, the residents were being stopped by the police for wearing green T-shirt with anti cyanide logo and mention of the word ‘cyanide’ was prohibited.

  • 13 Jan 2010, meeting with Department of Environmental and demands sent. Meeting decision was not conclusive.

  • 3rd August 2011, Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision in holding that the residents were out of time in seeking leave to judicial review (the decision). Though the court fee was waived, but the reason given was unacceptable.

  • 7th August 2011, villagers decided to appeal the case to Federal Court.

Kronologi Kempen Anti-Cyanide



  • 13 Januari 1997, Jabatan Alam Sekitar meluluskan Laporan Awal Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar (PEIA) daripada RAGM tanpa pengetahuan penduduk kampung.

  • 4 Disember 2006, setelah mengetahui ancaman Cyanide, penduduk kampung menubuhkan JawatanKuasa Bertindak Menentang Penggunaan Cyanide dalam Perlombongan Emas di Bukit Koman.

  • 2007, menulis surat bantahan dan memorandum kepada wakil rakyat dan pihak berkuasa tetapi gagal mendapat sebarang bantuan dari parti pemerintah dan pihak berkenaan.

  • Julai 2007, mendapat bantuan teknikal dan guaman daripada Sahabat Alam Malaysia.

  • Oktober 2007, penduduk kampung akhirnya memperolehi Laporan Awal Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar (PEIA), dan laporan dihantar kepada pakar untuk dikaji.

  • Febuari 2008, Dr.Glenn C. Miller melawat ke Bukit Koman. Pada Mei 2008, Dr Glenn C. Miller membuat laporan yang menyimpulkan bahawa RAGM:
    a) Tidak menyatakan cara-cara penyahtoksikan, pengendalian sisa-sisa mengandungi Cyanide, dan cara-cara pencegahan pencemaran udara
    b) Tiada langkah keselamatan yang meliputi kesihatan dan memberitahu penduduk-penduduk mengenai risiko keselamatan dan pelan kecemasan
    c) Tidak memenuhi piawaian keselamatan antarabangsa

  • 21 Mac 2008, ahli jawatankuasa memfailkan permohonan kebenaran bagi semakan kehakiman di Mahkamah Tinggi :-
    a) Membatalkan keputusan Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS) pada tahun 1997 yang meluluskan Laporan Awal Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar (PEIA) bagi projek perlombongan emas di kawasan itu;
    b) Meminta RAGM mengemukakan Laporan Terperinci Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar (Detail EIA).

  • Mulai tahun 2009, penduduk memasang alat pemantauan udara untuk mengukur indeks pencemaran udara bagi jangka masa panjang. Keputusannya sangat berbeza daripada laporan JAS. Penduduk mengalami masalah kesihatan. Ini menunjukkan pihak RAGM tidak dapat mengawal pelepasan gas beracun, keselamatan dan kesihatan penghuni Raub telah terancam!

  • April 2009, blog http://www.bancyanide.com/ ditubuhkan untuk memaklumkan orang awam tentang perjuangan dan perkembangan kempen anti cyanide ini.

  • 1 Jun 2009, Mahkamah Tinggi menolak permintaan semakan kehakiman atas sebab-sebab berikut:-
    (a) Laporan Awal Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar (PEIA) pada tahun 1997 tidak boleh dibatalkan disebabkan oleh faktor-faktor teknikal (permohonan harus difailkan dalam tempoh 40 hari selepas kelulusan PEIA)
    (b) Jabatan Alam Sekitar tidak memerlukan Laporan Terperinci Penilaian Kesan Alam Sekitar dari RAGM;

  • Kurang daripada seminggu selepas permohonan ditolak, penduduk kampung segera membuat rayuan. Selepas beberapa bulan, syarikat perlombongan emas juga membuat rayuan bahawa penduduk perlu membayar kos mahkamah. (Mahkamah Tinggi telah memutuskan bahawa penduduk kampung tidak perlu menanggung kos tersebut kerana kes tersebut melibatkan kepentingan awam.)

  • 23 Jun 2009, menganjurkan ceramah di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina KL & Selangor.

  • Julai 2009, demonstrasi aman disertai oleh beribu-ribu orang di Bukit Koman untuk membantah projek perlombongan emas yang menggunakan Cyanide.

  • Oktober 2009, menganjurkan ceramah sempenan Pesta Tanglong. Tetapi pemakaian baju hijau berlogo “ban cyanide” dan istilah ‘Cyanide’ dilarang oleh pihak polis.

  • 13 Jan 2010, berjumpa dengan Pengarah JAS dan menyampaikan permintaan (demands) penduduk kampung. Perjumpaan tidak berhasil

  • 3 Ogos 2011, Mahkamah Rayuan menolak rayuan penduduk kampung! Alasan: terlewat selama 11 tahun! Oleh sebab melibatkan kepentingan awam, penduduk kampung tidak perlu membayar kos mahkamah.

  • 7 Ogos 2011, penduduk membuat keputusan untuk memfailkan rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan.

Monday, August 15, 2011

10 Reasons Why We are Against The Use Of Cyanide In The Gold Mine Operation

10 Reasons Why We are Against The Use Of Cyanide In The Gold Mine Operation

1. Resident Is At High Risk To Be The Victims Of Hazardous Materials

Within a month after the Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM) start its operation, more than 300 residents from nearly villages were medically reported suffering with illness including: rashes, red and watery pupils, throat irritation, short breathing, nausea and vomiting, dizziness and others sign and symptoms of health problem. The resident’s healths are at high risk exposing to chronic poison.

2. SO2 & HCN Pollutants Have Exceeded The Limits

Air Quality was monitored by measuring devices bought by the residence. It indicated that (till 7/8/2011)

  • SO2 : detected 0.3- 47.66ppm of Sulfur Dioxide (Industrial safety index is

According to EPA, USA requirements, SO2 shall not exceed 0.3ppm, and not to be exceeded more than 4 times in a calendar year.

However, in a period of 9 months, the index has been found exceeding the limit 33 times. The highest SO2 detected, i.e. 47.6ppm is exceeding the safety limits by 150 times. A simple calculation tell the truth.

  • Hydrogen Cyanide: Detected 0.3- 30ppm (Occasionally) (Industrial safety index

Exposure of 20ppm HCN for few hours will trigger various poisonous related decease and can be lethal.

3. Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM) is just NEXT TO residence area, the nearest distance found in the world. There is no buffer zone between RAGM and residencies area.

4. Huge Usage of Hazardous Chemicals

Use large amount of hazardous chemicals annually:

  • 400 tones of Sodium Cyanide, average 1.5 tones a day. (A little mount of 100-200mg NaCN is enough put a person unconscious in10 seconds and to take a life in a minute)
  • 131.4 tones of Sulfur Dioxide and etc.

5. RAGM failed to fulfill the International Safety Standards. Is not the signatory of International Cyanide Management Code as claim

  • Dr. Glenn C. Miller, an Environmental Science expert from US that specialize in cyanide mining had performed an on-site investigation in February 2008 and released a report in 29th May in the same year. Report disclosed:
  • The design of the gold mine operation and waste disposal treatment was found defeated, and it failed to fulfill the International Safety Standards. The tailing will contain heavy metal and acidic waste, causes the metal-cyanide contamination. And this severely polluted the underground water, up to hundreds years of effect.
  • The gold mine claimed that they are complying to international safety standards, but failed to announce they are following which standards. Moreover, the official website of International Cyanide Management Code indicates that the company didn’t sign the code, or comply with the standards and the operational codes. (Dr. Glenn C. Miller is one of the committee members of ICMC).

6. RAGM Did Not Announce the Waste Water And Air Treatment Procedure And The Environmental Management Plan

In the 1997 PEIA, RAGM suggested to store the tailings that contained Cyanide and others hazardous waste in the open pit area and voids created by mining at the old tailings areas under dumping back arrangement.

There were not clear statements what are the waste treatment and detox procedure to prevent the hazardous tailing from being drained or contaminating the underground water. Up to date, RAGM failed to answer any queries related to this hazardous tailing disposal treatment.

There are 8 of the three storey height open tanks that contain processing fluid in operation every day. The hazardous gas (e.g. HCN and SO2) will be vaporized and spread as far as 5 km in diameter. The polluted air may cause acid rains that will cause serious health consequences, and leach into groundwater or nearby surface water that will polluted the water source.

RAGM did not response on the request to announce its Environmental Management Plan that will detail their environmental controls. RAGM also refuse to report the water quality and air quality monitoring results publicly.

7. RAGM is using Cyanide extraction process which is banned by many developed countries.

Cyanide extraction method is banned in many countries like: Germany, Turkey, Romania, Greece, Honduras, and Argentina, the federated states of Colorado, Wisconsin and Montana of U.S.A, followed by many other countries. Most of the environmental protection agencies all over the world is banned the Cyanide extraction process.

8. RAGM didn’t declare its Emergency Response Plan

Under the CIMA (1996) regulation, in the case the manufacturer is storing, producing or using more than 20 tones of Sulfur Dioxide, it is the manufacturer obligation to prepare an off-site emergency plan for the area surrounding his site. It is the duty of manufacturer to supply appropriate information to the concerned public without their having to request for it . The information included the hazardous and risk of the chemicals, nature of a major accident hazards including its potential effects on the population and the environment, how will be warned and kept inform in the event of an accident or emergency, method to evacuate and etc.

However, the company that used more than 130 tones of SO2 is failed to engage local villagers till now, despite many attempts to request for the information,

Furthermore, any forms of explanation and clarification session held by the invited experts were stopped and refrained by the police.

9. They is no such thing as “Cyanide Safeness”

  • The Cyanide leakage incidents have brought to environment disaster and catastrophe all around the world.
  • The most severe Cyanide contamination case happened in Romania (30th January 2000). A major leak and spillage from gold mine reservoir, releasing more than 100 thousand cubic meter of cyanide-rich and chemical contaminated waste water. The contaminant travelled via tributaries into the Somes &Tisza river and finally into the Danube river before reaching the Black Sea. Affected areas are as wide as Romania, Hungry, and Yugoslavia. Two thousands meter square of the Danube River was found contaminated after this incident. Putting the residence along the riverside at the lethal risk.

10. RAGM did not include Cyanide detoxification in its operating cost.

  • When the company first opens for its IPO in , they stated that detoxification has not been included in the operating costs as the cyanide destruction is not required it by the local authority.
  • This is offending the Malaysia Environmental Quality Act requirements.
  • RAGM does not include any funding and provision in terms of Cyanide leaking and recovery of environmental pollution.

居民反山埃冶金十大理由

1) 居民不要成为山埃采金的受害者

在金矿开始运作后短短一个月内三百人身体不适、皮肤痕痒出红疹、眼睛干涩流泪、喉咙不适、呼吸困难、失眠、呕吐、头痛头晕等。村民健康已拉警報!

2) 空气污染指数(SO2 & HCN)严重超标

村民自行购置探测器,空气探测结果如下(到7/8/2011為止):

  • 二氧化硫指数-0.3-47.6ppm!(工业安全指标

根据美国环境保护署(EPA)的指南,住宅区的二氧化硫指数不可超过0.3ppm,一年不可出现超过四次。短短9个月,超标指数竟出现33次。47.6ppm是安全指数0.3ppm的159倍!

  • 氰化氢指数-0.3-30ppm! (间歇性出现) (工业安全指标氰化氢只要持续数小时20ppm足以让人产生中毒症状,甚至死亡。

3) 全球最靠近民宅的金矿

山埃采金矿场与民宅之间完全没有缓冲区(Buffer Zone),只相隔一条马路而已。

4) 大量使用剧毒化学物质

每年使用:

  • 400吨的山埃(Sodium Cyanide),平均每日约1.5吨(只需区区100至200mg,便足以让人在1分钟内,甚至10秒钟内丧失知觉)
  • 131.4吨的二氧化硫(Sulfur Dioxide)等。

5) 金矿场不符合国际安全标准,也没有签署《国际山埃管理法典》

  • 2008年2月,专研山埃采金术的美国环境化学专家Dr. Glenn C. Miller到武吉公满实地考察,并在5月29日撰写了一份报告:
    • 详细列明金矿厂的设计漏洞百出,根本不符合国际安全标准,并指出金矿处理泥渣的方式皆可能释放出重金属和酸性废料,导致山埃金属污染(metal-cyanide contamination),严重影响未来数十年甚或数百年的地下水源。
    • 金 矿公司声称運作符合国际安全标准,所以安全无误,至今卻未能證實符合哪一個国际安全标准。实际上,《国际山埃管理法典》的官方网站显示该公司并没有签署这 项监督金矿业安全使用山埃的国际准则,而《国际山埃管理法典》指导委员会成员之一则是为村民撰写专家报告的米勒(Glenn C. Miller)。

6) 金矿公司没有公布有毒泥渣及废气的处理方式和環保管理計劃

  • 金矿公司1997年的环境评估报告透露:会把渗有山埃与各种化学废料的坭渣存放在深坑里,但是并没有列明任何防范措施,避免雨水冲蚀,污染地面和地下水源 。而且,金矿由始至终都回避泥渣如何安全处理的提问。
  • 八个约三层楼高宽达数十公尺的大槽露天作业,所排放的化学气体能够随风飘移直径五公里的距离。除了污染空气,同时也可能会形成酸雨,影響附近居民的健康、污染地面和地下水源。
  • 多次提问下,金矿公司至今仍然未公佈其環保管理計劃,也拒絕發佈其廢氣和廢水的測試數據。

7) 多个先进国禁用山埃采金法

德国、土耳其、罗马尼亚、希腊、洪都拉斯、阿根廷、美国科罗拉多州,威斯康星州及蒙大那已禁用山埃采金法。同时多个国家也即将效法。 几乎所有的环保机构皆鼓吹禁用山埃采金。

8) 金矿公司没有公布应急措施

根据《1996年主要工业意外风险控制条规》(CIMA Regulation):

  • 任何工业在任何时候储存、生产或使用二氧化硫超过20吨,务必拟定应急措施(off-site emergency respond plan);并主动提供相关资料予民众,这包括:其化学原料的毒性,有关风险;如何在紧急事发时与民众沟通;安排民众参与紧急逃生演习
  • 金矿公司并没有这么做,警方甚至施压阻止专家及村民举办讲座和解说会。

9) 山埃意外难防

  • 全世界曾发生多次金矿泄漏山埃意外。
  • 最严重的一次,2000年1月30日发生在罗马尼亚。

    当时一个金矿场的水坝破裂,排出10万立方公尺受山埃和其他重金属污染的流水,流入罗马尼亚、匈牙利和南斯拉夫的多条河流,其中欧洲多瑙河的2千平方公里集水区皆受到污染。污染导致河内大量生物死亡,沿河地区居民的生命与健康也受危害。

10) 金矿公司没有公布去毒预算和環保計劃,也没有储备金

  • 金矿公司当初招股时,公开对外宣称:“马来西亚地方政府和租地者没有进行山埃去毒的要求”,因此该公司没有将去毒工厂的运作费用算入成本。其實這不符合大馬環境素質法令的要求。
  • 公司也沒有储备金來應對金矿泄漏山埃意外和環境污染等。

10 Sebab Utama Membantah Penggunaan Cyanide Dalam Operasi Perlombongan Emas

1) Penduduk enggan menjadi mangsa perlombongan emas yang menggunakan Cyanide
Penduduk mengalami ketidakselesaan fizikal seperti kegatalan dan ruam kulit, kekeringan mata dan mata berair, ketidakselesaan tekak, kesukaran bernafas, mual dan muntah, sakit dan pening kepala, insomnia serta lain-lain simptom selepas operasi Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM). Kesihatan penduduk tempatan terjejas.

2) Pencemaran udara – Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) dan Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) adalah jauh melebihi piawaian indeks.

3) Logi RAGM bersebelahan dengan kawasan perumahan tanpa zon penampan. Ia merupakan lombong emas yang paling dekat dengan kawasan perumahan di dunia.
4) Penggunaan banyak bahan kimia yang berbahaya dan bertoksik :
· 400 tan Sodium Cyanide, 131.4 tan Sulfur Dioxide dan lain-lain bahan kimia berbahaya digunakan tahunan.

5) Logi perlombongan emas tidak memenuhi piawaian keselamatan antarabangsa, dan tidak mendapat pengiktirafan Kod Pengurusan Cyanide Antarabangsa (International Cyanide Management Code).
Pakar Sains Alam Sekitar berwibawa dari Amerika Syarikat, Dr. Glenn C. Miller membuat penyiasatan di Bukit Koman, beliau membuat kesimpulan bahawa logi perlombongan emas di Bukit Koman tidak memenuhi piawaian keselamatan antarabangsa.

6) RAGM tidak mengumumkan cara penyahtoksikan dan pengendalian sisa-sisa, air dan gas bertoksik serta pelan pemuliharaan alam sekitar.

7) Banyak negara maju telah melarang penggunaan Cyanide dalam perlombongan emas
Seperti German, Turki, Romania, Greece, Honduras, Argentina, dan negeri Colorado, Wisconsin dan Montana di Amerika Syarikat.

8) RAGM tidak mengumumkan Pelan Tindakan Kecemasan
9) Malang tidak berbau. Banyak kemalangan tumpahan dan kebocoran Cyanide berlaku di seluruh dunia yang mengancam nyawa dan alam sekitar.

10) RAGM tidak berhajat untuk menjalankan penyahtoksikan kerana Peninsular Gold Limited (PGL, syarikat ibu RAGM) telah menyatakan dalam dokumen yang dikemukakan kepada Bursa Saham London, bahawa ‘Tiada permintaan daripada kerajaan Malaysia untuk menjalankan penyahtoksikan. Oleh itu, kos penyahtoksikan tidak termasuk dalam bujet PGL.’

Sunday, August 14, 2011

福利组移交法律援助金




武吉公满新村福利组于今日宣布正式解散。

山埃是劳勿武吉公满村民的公敌。如今反山埃采金委员会遭上诉庭驳回申请后,继续上诉联邦法院,急需法律援助基金。村民秉持着村难当前,匹夫有责的理念,村民一致议决福利金余款全部充作反山埃委员会法律援助基金,支持《抗山埃保家园》运动。

福利组主席张思胜移交RM8,529.11予反山埃采金委员会主席黄金雄先生。

仪式结束后,村民在民众会堂前留影,高喊“我们不要山埃”!




Saturday, August 13, 2011

集体祭拜“好兄弟” ,求武吉公满没黄金!


适逢每年‘鬼节’(农历七月十四)鬼门大开,一些道教信徒都会携带元宝香烛前往路边祭拜‘好兄弟’,以祈求平安顺境。在劳勿武吉公满,今天约有20余名村民,相约在鬼节前夕提早进行集体祭拜好兄弟的仪式,但是大家祈求的却是劳勿武吉公满所蕴藏的黄金,都能够化为流水。

今午3时许就天不作美下起雨来直至晚上。但绵绵细雨未阻这群热爱家园的村民誓保家园的决心。这项祭拜仪式在晚上7点45分开始,来自四面八方的村民身上都穿着《抗山埃,保家园》的青色上衣,风雨无阻地各自带着祭品前往劳勿澳洲金矿公司门前的空地上进行祭拜。

黄金化水求平安

这一次祭拜好兄弟和以往不同,以往是希望好兄弟能够保佑出入平安生意兴旺,这次大家祈求的是武吉公满地底下的黄金都化为流水,化成乌有。山埃事件爆发虽已有5年之久,村民至今仍坚持反对劳勿澳洲金矿公司使用山埃采金术。眼见金矿公司操作已有两年半,加上拖了两年的诉讼案于今年8月3日遭上诉庭驳回上诉申请,无计可施下村民唯有求好兄弟‘帮帮忙’,让武吉公满的黄金消失,因为“没有了黄金”就是金矿公司最快倒闭或关门的理由。只有金矿公司关门大吉,不再有山埃采金,我们才能够健康平安的过日子。

众人祭拜后,在金矿门前高喊“我们不要山埃”,“ban cyanide”,“我们要安全家园”,“澳洲人滚回澳洲”的口号。

祭拜仪式的尾接尾声时,几位警员才闻风而至,询及村民出现金矿门前的目的。

这项祭拜仪式结束于8时30分。

About Me |简介

Kami adalah penduduk yang dilahirkan dan dibesarkan di Bukit Koman, Raub. Sememangnya, kami seharusnya dapat menikmati rahmat yang ditakdirkan, iaitu tinggal dengan aman. Namun, ketenteraman dan kesihatan penduduk tergugat apabila apabila lombong emas yang bersebelahan dengan rumah kediaman kami mengguna Sodium Cyanide dalam perlombongan. Ratusan penduduk mengadu tentang masalah kesihatan dalam tempoh 1 bulan selepas lombong emas mula beroperasi pada Febuari 2009. Kami tidak dapat lagi bertoleransi dengan ancaman ini. Untuk menjamin keselamatan ahli keluarga tersayang dan masa depan generasi kami yang akan datang, kami sanggup melakukan apa sahaja demi mempertahankan keamanan dan keselamatan kampung halaman kami. 我们是在劳勿武吉公满土生土长数十年的普通居民。本已到了知天命之年,奈何眼见挚爱的家园因为山埃的入侵,面临沦为“毒村”的致命威胁,我们决定站出来,抗战到底!为了我们爱惜的家人,为了我们的下一代,背水一战,决不妥协! Email:bancyanide@Gmail.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BanCyanideInGoldMining